About Syllabus Blog Tools PYQ Quizes

IFRS vs Ind-AS

Key takeaways:

  • Understand the core differences between IFRS and Ind-AS, focusing on presentation, terminology, and carve-outs.
  • Learn how major standards like IFRS 15 (Revenue) and IFRS 16 (Leases) are treated under Ind-AS with practical Indian context.
  • Grasp the reconciliation process for Indian companies adopting Ind-AS, including a step-by-step example relevant for exam preparation.
IFRS vs Ind-AS
IFRS vs Ind-AS
(Specialized Accounting)

Source: Pixabay

IFRS and Ind-AS both guide the preparation and presentation of financial statements, but they do so with subtle and sometimes significant differences. These differences can affect how profits, assets, and liabilities are measured and disclosed. For Indian companies, understanding these distinctions is a practical necessity for accurate reporting and strategic decision-making.

IFRS vs Ind-AS

Aspect IFRS Ind-AS Comments/Carve-outs
Presentation Flexible structure; format is principle-based, allowing customization. Prescribed formats mandated by Indian law for all key statements. Ind-AS restricts format flexibility to ensure alignment with Indian statutes.
Terminology Uses global terms (e.g., "Statement of Financial Position"). Adapts some Indian terms; sometimes uses "Balance Sheet" and other familiar labels. Minor but relevant for legal documentation.
Revenue Recognition IFRS 15 applies universally, limited exceptions. Ind-AS 115 based on IFRS 15, but with industry-specific carve-outs (notably real estate). Carve-outs tailor recognition to Indian business practices.
Leases IFRS 16 requires lessees to recognize most leases on balance sheet. Ind-AS 116, mostly aligned, but includes transition reliefs for Indian companies. Carve-outs in initial application and short-term leases.
Financial Instruments IFRS 9 applies, including fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) for many instruments. Ind-AS 109, with modifications (e.g., treatment of perpetual debt, transition options). Several carve-outs impact measurement and disclosure.
Revaluation of Assets Permitted for all asset classes. More restrictive; allowed only for certain categories. Designed to prevent volatility in Indian reporting.
Impairment Testing One-step approach (recoverable amount test). Two-step approach (indicator-based, then recoverable amount test). Reflects Indian regulatory caution.
Taxation General guidance on deferred taxes. Specific guidance for Indian tax statutes and adjustments. Ensures compliance with local laws.

Carve-outs: The Indian Context

Carve-outs are deliberate deviations from IFRS to accommodate India's legal, business, and economic environment. They ensure Ind-AS remains practical for Indian companies while preserving the spirit of global comparability. Why do these carve-outs matter? Because they can affect reported profits, asset values, and key financial ratios factors that investors and analysts scrutinize closely.

IFRS 16 (Leases) and IFRS 15 (Revenue): Impact in India

a. IFRS 16 (Leases)

IFRS 16 revolutionized lease accounting by requiring lessees to recognize nearly all leases as 'right-of-use' assets with corresponding liabilities. Under Ind-AS 116, this principle largely carries over, but Indian companies benefit from some transition reliefs and practical expedients not present in IFRS. For example, certain short-term and low-value leases may remain off-balance-sheet, easing the administrative burden for smaller firms. Transition options provided by Ind-AS 116 allow companies to avoid restating prior periods in some cases, an accommodation reflecting India's gradual adoption process.

b. IFRS 15 (Revenue)

Revenue recognition under IFRS 15 is strictly control-based: revenue is recognized when control of goods or services passes to the customer. Ind-AS 115 is nearly identical in principle but introduces carve-outs for industries like real estate, where Indian business practices and regulatory requirements differ. For example, revenue for certain real estate projects might be recognized over time under Ind-AS, even when IFRS would require recognition at a single point in time. These modifications ensure financial results better reflect the economic substance of Indian transactions.

Example: Indian Company Adopting Ind-AS – Reconciliation of Net Profit

Consider a listed Indian manufacturing company transitioning from the previous Indian GAAP to Ind-AS. The reconciliation process helps stakeholders understand the effect of adopting Ind-AS on the company’s reported net profit.

Step 1: Start with the net profit as reported under previous Indian GAAP for the year.
Step 2: Adjust for differences such as:
  • Fair valuation of financial instruments: Under Ind-AS, many investments are measured at fair value through profit or loss, whereas earlier standards used historical cost.
  • Lease accounting changes: Operating leases now appear on the balance sheet as assets and liabilities, impacting both depreciation and finance costs.
  • Revenue recognition timing: For example, real estate revenue may be deferred or accelerated depending on control transfer rules under Ind-AS 115.
  • Deferred tax adjustments: Ind-AS requires recognition of deferred tax on more items than previous GAAP.
Step 3: Calculate the revised net profit after all these adjustments.
Step 4: Disclose a reconciliation statement in the notes, showing how each item affected net profit.

This stepwise reconciliation ensures transparency, allowing users to track exactly how new standards change reported performance.

Example Questions

  • Which of the following is a carve-out in Ind-AS compared to IFRS?
    • a) Revenue recognition for real estate projects
    • b) Presentation of financial statements
    • c) Transition reliefs in lease accounting
    • d) All of the above

    Correct answer: d) All of the above

  • Which standard in Ind-AS deals with leases?
    • a) Ind-AS 16
    • b) Ind-AS 115
    • c) Ind-AS 116
    • d) Ind-AS 110

    Correct answer: c) Ind-AS 116

  • Under Ind-AS, which of the following is not permitted for all asset classes?
    • a) Historical cost measurement
    • b) Revaluation
    • c) Fair value through profit or loss
    • d) Amortized cost

    Correct answer: b) Revaluation



Recent Posts

View All Posts